David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 162 (2):225 - 233 (2008)
Richard Tieszen [Tieszen, R. (2005). Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXX(1), 153–173.] has argued that the group-theoretical approach to modern geometry can be seen as a realization of Edmund Husserl’s view of eidetic intuition. In support of Tieszen’s claim, the present article discusses Husserl’s approach to geometry in 1886–1902. Husserl’s first detailed discussion of the concept of group and invariants under transformations takes place in his notes on Hilbert’s Memoir Ueber die Grundlagen der Geometrie that Hilbert wrote during the winter 1901–1902. Husserl’s interest in the Memoir is a continuation of his long-standing concern about analytic geometry and in particular Riemann and Helmholtz’s approach to geometry. Husserl favored a non-metrical approach to geometry; thus the topological nature of Hilbert’s Memoir must have been intriguing to him. The task of phenomenology is to describe the givenness of this logos, hence Husserl needed to develop the notion of eidetic intuition.
|Keywords||Husserl Geometry Eidetic intuition Group theory Foundations of geometry Hilbert|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Nicholas Griffin & Roberto Torretti (1981). Philosophy of Geometry From Riemann to Poincare. Philosophical Quarterly 31 (125):374.
Mirja Hartimo (2006). Mathematical Roots of Phenomenology: Husserl and the Concept of Number. History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (4):319-337.
Mirja Helena Hartimo (2007). Towards Completeness: Husserl on Theories of Manifolds 1890–1901. Synthese 156 (2):281 - 310.
Edmund Husserl (1994). Early Writings in the Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Edmund Husserl (1969). Formal and Transcendental Logic. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jairo da Silva (2012). Husserl on Geometry and Spatial Representation. Axiomathes 22 (1):5-30.
Edmund Husserl & Marvin Farber (eds.) (1940/1968). Philosophical Essays in Memory of Edmund Husserl. New York, Greenwood Press.
Gordon Belot (2003). Remarks on the Geometry of Visibles. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (213):581–586.
Richard Tieszen (1992). Kurt Godel and Phenomenology. Philosophy of Science 59 (2):176-194.
Guillermo Rosado Haddock (2012). Husserl's Conception of Physical Theories and Physical Geometry in the Time of the Prolegomena : A Comparison with Duhem's and Poincaré's Views. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 22 (1):171-193.
Jan von Plato (1997). Formalization of Hilbert's Geometry of Incidence and Parallelism. Synthese 110 (1):127-141.
Jan Platvono (1997). Formalization of Hilbert's Geometry of Incidence and Parallelism. Synthese 110 (1):127-141.
Rene Jagnow (2003). Geometry and Spatial Intuition: A Genetic Approach. Dissertation, Mcgill University (Canada)
René Jagnow (2006). Edmund Husserl on the Applicability of Formal Geometry. In Emily Carson & Renate Huber (eds.), Intuition and the Axiomatic Method. Springer. 67--85.
Richard Tieszen (2005). Free Variation and the Intuition of Geometric Essences: Some Reflections on Phenomenology and Modern Geometry. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):153–173.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads46 ( #51,882 of 1,696,585 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #115,608 of 1,696,585 )
How can I increase my downloads?