Gallie and the scientific tradition
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):234-239 (1959)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesW. B. Gallie (1950). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 59 (234):433-435.
W. B. Gallie (1949). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 58 (229):433-435.
T. L. Short (2010). Did Peirce Have a Cosmology? Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (4):521-543.
Nancey Murphy (2010). Robert John Russell Versus the New Atheists. Zygon 45 (1):193-212.
Giovanni Boniolo (2007). On Scientific Representations: From Kant to a New Philosophy of Science. Palgrave Macmillan.
Tom Angier (2012). Alasdair MacIntyre's Analysis of Tradition. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1).
Edward Shils (1995). On the Tradition of Intellectuals. Tradition and Discovery 22 (2):10-26.
W. B. Gallie (1957). What Makes a Subject Scientific? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8 (30):118-139.
W. B. Gallie (1959). Reply to David Harrah's Discussion Note. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):239-240.
David-Hillel Ruben (2011). W.B. Gallie and Essentially Contested Concepts. Philosophical Papers 39 (2):257-270.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #274,830 of 549,084 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
