David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Religious Studies 13 (2):155 - 165 (1977)
A number of writers have recently taken fresh looks at the many centuries-old ontological proof of Anselm. 1 Three of these writers seem to agree with me that traditional ways of treating this topic have been inadequate and that the proof, whether or not it is a sufficient reason for belief, is not without important bearings for philosophy of religion. These writers are Malcolm, Findlay, and Plantinga. With each of these I find considerable common ground, and they have all indicated to me that they are aware of this. In the present article on the topic, however, I wish to discuss a fourth writer, who differs rather sharply from the other three and particularly from me. Since Hick's views are shared in certain respects by what I take to be a main stream of contemporary thought, particularly in Britain, it seems worth while to accept the challenge he offers
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jung H. Lee (1998). Problems of Religious Pluralism: A Zen Critique of John Hick's Ontological Monomorphism. Philosophy East and West 48 (3):453-477.
Royce P. Jones (1985). The Logical Status of Brain Death Criteria. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (4):387-396.
George I. Mavrodes (1997). A Response to John Hick. Faith and Philosophy 14 (3):289-294.
John Hick (1967). The Many-Faced Argument. New York, Macmillan.
Amir Dastmalchian (2009). Religious Ambiguity in Hick’s Religious Pluralism. International Journal of Hekmat 1:75-89.
John Hick & Arvind Sharma (eds.) (1993). God, Truth, and Reality: Essays in Honour of John Hick. St. Martin's Press.
John Hick (1976). Death and Eternal Life. London: Collins.
John Hick (1990). A John Hick Reader. Trinity Press International.
John H. Hick (2009). The Ontological Argument : An Assessment. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy of Religion: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press
Eric Silverman (2009). John Hick's Soul-Making Theodicy and the Virtue of Love. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:329-343.
John H. Hick (1972). [Hick, Necessary Being, and the Cosmological Argument] Comment. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (4):485 - 487.
William Hasker (2011). The Many Gods of Hick and Mavrodes. In Kelly James Clark & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press
Marc Lange (2005). A Counterfactual Analysis of the Concepts of Logical Truth and Necessity. Philosophical Studies 125 (3):277 - 303.
Bernd Irlenborn (2011). John Hick's Pluralism. Philosophy and Theology 23 (2):267-280.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads11 ( #307,889 of 1,796,164 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,527 of 1,796,164 )
How can I increase my downloads?