David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 14 (3):181 - 194 (1995)
InUnto this Last, John Ruskin argued that Britain''s industrial society was morally degenerate and pernicious in that it drove the labouring class into cultural and material poverty. The thinking of the Political Economists, which supported the new liberal industrial order, was correspondingly flawed, because it lacked any credible moral element. Ruskin''s writings are in essence an appeal to the business leader to behave in a socially responsible, paternalistic fashion according to his own moral prescriptions. In this way, he believed that British society might be regenerated. This article examines the ways in William Morris sought to give practical expression to these ideas. There is no perfect correspondence between the business notions of John Ruskin and the practice of William Morris. Yet it is evident that Morris stuck to many of his mentor''s ideas with remarkable tenacity; and the operation of the Morris business, especially those aspects relating to design, craftsmanship, work organisation, working conditions, scale and the market, owed much to Ruskin.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Ruskin (2008). The Nineteenth Century. The Chesterton Review 34 (1-2):269-270.
David M. Craig (2004). Naves and Nukes: John Ruskin as "Augustinian" Social Theorist? Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):325 - 356.
A. Lubowski-Jahn (2011). A Comparative Analysis of the Landscape Aesthetics of Alexander von Humboldt and John Ruskin. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (3):321-333.
Bertram Morris (1955). Ruskin on the Pathetic Fallacy, or on How a Moral Theory of Art May Fail. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 14 (2):248-266.
Sydney Waterlow (1912). Book Review:The Life of Ruskin. E. T. Cook; Ruskin: A Study in Personality. A. C. Benson. [REVIEW] Ethics 23 (1):95-.
Ross Elliot Eddington (2003). Millett's Rationalist Error. Hypatia 18 (3):193-211.
R. Hewison, I. Warrell & S. Wildman, (Exhibition - 260works) Ruskin, Turner and the Pre-Raphaelites: Works by Ruskin, 19th Century Artists and Old Masters.
R. G. Collingwood (1922/1971). Ruskin's Philosophy: An Address Delivered at the Ruskin Centenary Conference. Titus Wilson & Son.
Harold Hector Wilson, Charles Morris' Maitreyan Path as Via Positiva : Toward a Semiotic of Religious Symbolism.
James Edward Tobin (1943). The Educational Theories of John Ruskin. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):533-534.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #242,353 of 1,696,615 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #186,707 of 1,696,615 )
How can I increase my downloads?