David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In James Van Cleve & Robert E. Frederick (eds.), The Philosophy of Right and Left. Kluwer. 263-313 (1991)
Consider your right hand and a mirror image duplicate of it. Kant calls such pairs incongruent counterparts. According to him they have the following puzzling features. The relation and situation of the parts of your hand with respect to one another are not sufficient to distinguish it from its mirror duplicate. Nevertheless, there is a spatial difference between the two. Turn and twist them how you will, you cannot make one of them occupy the exact boundaries now occupied by the other. In his 1768 paper, ‘Concerning the Ultimate Foundations of the Differentiation of Regions in Space’, Kant uses these claims to argue against relational accounts of space and goes on to argue that the difference between incongruent counterparts depends on a relation to absolute space as a whole. In his 1770 Inaugural Dissertation he argued that this difference could not be captured by concepts alone but required appeal to intuition. In the Prolegomena (1783) and again in the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science (1786) Kant appealed to these puzzling features of incongruent counterparts to support his transcendental idealism about space.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hoke Robinson (1981). Incongruent Counterparts and the Refutation of Idealism. Kant-Studien 72 (1-4):391-397.
Hud Hudson (2004). Temporally Incongruent Counterparts. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2):337–343.
Hud Hudson (2004). Temporally Incongruent Counterparts. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2):337 - 343.
Carolyn Brighouse (1999). Incongruent Counterparts and Modal Relationism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):53 – 68.
Rogério Passos Severo (2007). A Puzzle About Incongruent Counterparts and the Critique of Pure Reason. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (4):507–521.
David Landy (2013). What Incongruent Counterparts Show. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):507-524.
Sean Walsh (2007). Incongruent Counterparts and Causality. Kant-Studien 98 (4):418-430.
Graham Nerlich (2009). Incongruent Counterparts and the Reality of Space. Philosophy Compass 4 (3):598-613.
Paul Rusnock & Rolf George (1995). A Last Shot at Kant and Incongruent Counterparts. Kant-Studien 86 (3):257-277.
Rogério Passos Severo (2005). Three Remarks on the Interpretation of Kant on Incongruent Counterparts. Kantian Review 9 (1):30-57.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-04-09
Total downloads3 ( #304,280 of 1,100,077 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #127,210 of 1,100,077 )
How can I increase my downloads?