Logic as a Universal Medium or Logic as a Calculus? Husserl and the Presuppositions of “the Ultimate Presupposition of Twentieth Century Philosophy”
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (4):569-580 (2006)
This paper discusses Jean van Heijenoort’s (1967) and Jaakko and Merrill B. Hintikka’s (1986, 1997) distinction between logic as auniversal language and logic as a calculus, and its applicability to Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology. Although it is argued that Husserl’s phenomenology shares characteristics with both sides, his view of logic is closer to the model-theoretical, logic-as-calculus view. However, Husserl’s philosophy as transcendental philosophy is closer to the universalist view. This paper suggests that Husserl’s position shows that holding a model-theoretical view of logic does not necessarily imply a calculus view about the relations between language and the world. The situation calls for reflection about the distinction: It will be suggested that the applicability of the van Heijenoort and the Hintikkas distinction either has to be restricted to a particular philosopher’s views about logic, in which case no implications about his or her more general philosophical views should be inferred from it; or the distinction turns into a question of whether our human predicament is inescapable or whether it is possible, presumably by means of model theory, to obtain neutral answers to philosophical questions. Thus the distinction ultimately turns into a question about the correct method for doing philosophy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Irving H. Anellis (2012). Jean van Heijenoort's Conception of Modern Logic, in Historical Perspective. Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):339-409.
Similar books and articles
Mirja Hartimo (2012). Husserl and the Algebra of Logic: Husserl's 1896 Lectures. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 22 (1):121-133.
Jan Woleński (2012). Logic as Calculus Versus Logic as Language, Language as Calculus Versus Language as Universal Medium, and Syntax Versus Semantics. Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):587-596.
Kenneth Knies (2011). The Practical Obscurity of Philosophy: Husserl's “ Arbeit der Probleme der Letzten Voraussetzungen ”. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 27 (2):83-104.
Mirja Helena Hartimo (2007). Towards Completeness: Husserl on Theories of Manifolds 1890–1901. Synthese 156 (2):281 - 310.
Philippe De Rouilhan (2012). In Defense of Logical Universalism: Taking Issue with Jean van Heijenoort. [REVIEW] Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):553-586.
Marina Paola Banchetti-Robino (1997). Husserl's Theory of Language as Calculus Ratiocinator. Synthese 112 (3):303-321.
E. -W. Stachow (1976). Completeness of Quantum Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (2):237 - 280.
Irving H. Anellis (2012). Editor's Introduction to Jean van Heijenoort, Historical Development of Modern Logic. Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):301-326.
Denis Fisette (ed.) (2003). Husserl's Logical Investigations Reconsidered. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Philippe Rouilhan (2012). In Defense of Logical Universalism: Taking Issue with Jean van Heijenoort. Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):553-586.
Andrzej Wiśniewski & Vasilyi Shangin (2006). Socratic Proofs for Quantifiers★. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (2):147 - 178.
M. Hartimo (2012). Husserl's Pluralistic Phenomenology of Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 20 (1):86-110.
Gary Banham (ed.) (2005). Husserl and the Logic of Experience. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads15 ( #109,614 of 1,102,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #182,643 of 1,102,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?