Neuroethics, neuroeducation, and classroom teaching: Where the brain sciences meet pedagogy [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Neuroethics 5 (2):135-143 (2012)
|Abstract||The popularization of neuroscientific ideas about learning—sometimes legitimate, sometimes merely commercial—poses a real challenge for classroom teachers who want to understand how children learn. Until teacher preparation programs are reconceived to incorporate relevant research from the neuro- and cognitive sciences, teachers need translation and guidance to effectively use information about the brain and cognition. Absent such guidance, teachers, schools, and school districts may waste time and money pursuing so called brain-based interventions that lack a firm basis in research. Meanwhile, the success of our schools will continue to be narrowly defined by achievement standards that ignore knowledge of the neural and cognitive processes of learning. To achieve the goals of neuroeducation, its proponents must address unique ethical issues that neuroeducation raises for five different groups of individuals: a) practicing teachers, b) neuroscience researchers whose work could inform education, c) publishers and the popular media, d) educational policy-makers, and e) university-level teacher educators. We suggest ways in which these ethical challenges can be met and provide a model for teacher preparation that will enable teachers themselves to translate findings from the neuro-and cognitive sciences and use legitimate research to inform how they design and deliver effective instruction.|
|Keywords||Educational neuroethics Neuroeducation Pedagogy Classroom instruction|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Cayce Hook & Martha Farah (2013). Neuroscience for Educators: What Are They Seeking, and What Are They Finding? Neuroethics 6 (2):331-341.
Daniel Ansari, Bert de Smedt & Roland Grabner (2012). Neuroeducation–a Critical Overview of an Emerging Field. Neuroethics 5 (2):105-117.
David William Jardine (2008). Back to the Basics of Teaching and Learning: Thinking the World Together. Routledge.
Catherine E. Milne, The Pedagogical Implications of Teacher Personal Philosophies of Science in the School Science Classroom : An Interpretive Study.
Paul Howard-Jones & Kate Fenton (2012). The Need for Interdisciplinary Dialogue in Developing Ethical Approaches to Neuroeducational Research. Neuroethics 5 (2):119-134.
Gilbert Burgh (2008). Professional Development and Training. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 27:5-13.
Usha Goswami (2008). Principles of Learning, Implications for Teaching: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (3-4):381-399.
Yo-An Lee & Akihiko Takahashi (2011). Lesson Plans and the Contingency of Classroom Interactions. Human Studies 34 (2):209-227.
Jenny Reeves (2007). Inventing the Chartered Teacher. British Journal of Educational Studies 55 (1):56 - 76.
Michael R. Matthews (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
Sandra Bruneau (1998). Adding Pep (Protocol, Ethics, and Policies) to the Preparation of New Professionals. Ethics and Behavior 8 (3):249 – 267.
Zhu Xiaoman & Liu Cilin* (2004). Teacher Training for Moral Education in China. Journal of Moral Education 33 (4):481-494.
Nava Maslovaty (2000). Teachers' Choice of Teaching Strategies for Dealing with Socio-Moral Dilemmas in the Elementary School. Journal of Moral Education 29 (4):429-444.
Louise Poulson (2001). Paradigm Lost? Subject Knowledge, Primary Teachers and Education Policy. British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (1):40 - 55.
Added to index2011-05-22
Total downloads22 ( #62,807 of 738,405 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,405 )
How can I increase my downloads?