Newtonian Science, Miracles, and the Laws of Nature

Journal of the History of Ideas 56 (4):531 - 553 (1995)
Newton, along with a number of other seventeenth-century scientists, is frequently charged with having held an inconsistent view of nature and its operations, believing on the one hand in immutable laws of nature, and on the other in divine interventions into the natural order. In this paper I argue that Newton, William Whiston, and Samuel Clarke, came to understand miracles, not as violations of laws of nature, but rather as beneficent coincidences which were remarkable either because they were unusual, or were beyond current understandings of nature. In this manner the Newtonians managed to reconcile their scientific pursuits with their religious convictions
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2709991
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,879
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Joshua Ehrlich (2013). William Robertson and Scientific Theism. Modern Intellectual History 10 (3):519-542.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

6 ( #322,123 of 1,725,168 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #349,103 of 1,725,168 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.