David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Minds and Machines 1 (1):43-54 (1991)
Explaining the mind by building machines with minds runs into the other-minds problem: How can we tell whether any body other than our own has a mind when the only way to know is by being the other body? In practice we all use some form of Turing Test: If it can do everything a body with a mind can do such that we can't tell them apart, we have no basis for doubting it has a mind. But what is "everything" a body with a mind can do? Turing's original "pen-pal" version (the TT) only tested linguistic capacity, but Searle has shown that a mindless symbol-manipulator could pass the TT undetected. The Total Turing Test (TTT) calls for all of our linguistic and robotic capacities; immune to Searle's argument, it suggests how to ground a symbol manipulating system in the capacity to pick out the objects its symbols refer to. No Turing Test, however, can guarantee that a body has a mind. Worse, nothing in the explanation of its successful performance requires a model to have a mind at all. Minds are hence very different from the unobservables of physics (e.g., superstrings); and Turing Testing, though essential for machine-modeling the mind, can really only yield an explanation of the body.
|Keywords||Artificial intelligence causality cognition computation explanation mind/body problem other-minds problem robotics Searle symbol grounding Turing Test|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Max Velmans (1991). Is Human Information Processing Conscious? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):651-69.
Ned Block (1991). Evidence Against Epiphenomenalism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):670-672.
Max Velmans (1991). Consciousness From a First-Person Perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):702-726.
David Navon (1991). The Function of Consciousness or of Information? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):690-691.
Christof Koch & Francis Crick (1991). Understanding Awareness at the Neuronal Level. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):683-685.
Similar books and articles
S. Harnad (2000). Minds, Machines and Turing. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (4):425-445.
Stevan Harnad (1995). Does Mind Piggyback on Robotic and Symbolic Capacity? In H. Morowitz & J. Singer (eds.), The Mind, the Brain, and Complex Adaptive Systems. Addison Wesley
Stevan Harnad (2006). The Annotation Game: On Turing (1950) on Computing, Machinery, and Intelligence. In Robert Epstein & G. Peters (eds.), [Book Chapter] (in Press). Kluwer
Stevan Harnad (2006). The Annotation Game: On Turing (1950) on Computing, Machinery, and Intelligence. In Robert Epstein & Grace Peters (eds.), [Book Chapter] (in Press). Kluwer
Stevan Harnad (2000). Minds, Machines and Turing: The Indistinguishability of Indistinguishables. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (4):425-445.
Larry Hauser (1993). Reaping the Whirlwind: Reply to Harnad's Other Bodies, Other Minds. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 3 (2):219-37.
J. J. Clarke (1972). Turing Machines and the Mind-Body Problem. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (February):1-12.
Stevan Harnad (2001). Minds, Machines and Turing: The Indistinguishability of Indistinguishables. Philosophical Explorations.
Ayse P. Saygin, Ilyas Cicekli & Varol Akman (2000). Turing Test: 50 Years Later. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 10 (4):463-518.
Stevan Harnad (2003). Can a Machine Be Conscious? How? Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (4):67-75.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads69 ( #46,989 of 1,725,444 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #72,348 of 1,725,444 )
How can I increase my downloads?