On Hartshorne's formulation of the ontological argument: A rejoinder
Philosophical Review 54 (1):63 - 65 (1945)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFelipe Ledesma (2007). The Ontological Argument in the Tractatus. Metaphysica 8 (2):179-201.
W. Gregory Lycan (1968). Hartshorne and Findlay on 'Necessity' in the Ontological Argument. Philosophical Studies 17:132-141.
David A. Pailin (1968). Some Comments on Hartshorne's Presentation of the Ontological Argument. Religious Studies 4 (1):103 - 122.
Charles Hartshorne (1967). Rejoinder to Purtill. The Review of Metaphysics 21 (2):308 - 309.
Charles Hartshorne (1944). The Formal Validity and Real Significance of the Ontological Argument. Philosophical Review 53 (3):225-245.
Charles Hartshorne (1961). The Logic of the Ontological Argument. Journal of Philosophy 58 (17):471-473.
Daniel A. Dombrowski (2006). Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. Cambridge University Press.
Charles Hartshorne (1945). Professor Hartshorne's Syllogism: Rejoinder. Philosophical Review 54 (5):506-508.
William Elton (1945). On Hartshorne's Formulation of the Ontological Argument: A Criticism. Philosophical Review 54 (1):63.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #123,218 of 549,196 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,196 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
