David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):707 - 716 (2009)
We typically test norms with reference to their usefulness in dealing with social problems and issues, though sometimes we use hypernorms to evaluate them. The hypernorms that we find most acceptable do not guide action in the way local norms do. They do, however, raise challenging questions that we should ask in evaluating any practice and its associated norms. In this respect, they differ from the principles associated with traditional, as opposed to modern, morality. As societies become more alike, in part as a result of globalization, they will face increasingly similar problems. Then their local norms will be more similar, and they will be more likely to share hypernorms. Insofar as we can agree to try to justify our hypernorms, we are likely to converge on the hypernorms characteristic of modern rather than traditional morality. But people are often attached to their old norms and so are not very good at seeing how hypernorms raise questions that challenge the old norms. Here moral imagination should aid in the adjustment process. A system of democratic capitalism is hospitable to a good kind of moral convergence
|Keywords||principles norms hypernorms moral progress moral imagination|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Rawls (1993). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.
Richard Rorty (2006). Philosophy's Role Vis-À-Vis Business Ethics'. Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (3):369-380.
Richard Rorty (2006). Replies to Koehn, de George, and Werhane. Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (3):409-413.
Thomas Scanlon (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John R. Rowan (1997). Grounding Hypernorms: Toward a Contractarian Theory of Business Ethics. Economics and Philosophy 13 (1):107-112.
Bryan W. Husted (1999). A Critique of the Empirical Methods of Integrative Social Contracts Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 20 (3):227 - 235.
George G. Brenkert (2009). ISCT, Hypernorms, and Business: A Reinterpretation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):645 - 658.
Anita Cava (1995). Social Contract Theory and Gender Discrimination. Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (2):257-270.
M. Joseph Sirgy, Philip H. Siegel & J. S. Johar (2005). Toward a Code of Ethics for Accounting Educators. Journal of Business Ethics 61 (3):215 - 234.
Lovasoa Ramboarisata (2009). Cooperative Values as Potential Hypernorms. International Corporate Responsibility Series 4:209-228.
Thomas W. Dunfee (2006). A Critical Perspective of Integrative Social Contracts Theory: Recurring Criticisms and Next Generation Research Topics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 68 (3):303 - 328.
Waheed Hussain (2009). No More Lemmings, Please - Reflections on the Communal Authority Thesis. Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):717 - 728.
Thomas Donaldson (2009). Compass and Dead Reckoning: The Dynamic Implications of ISCT. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):659 - 664.
Mark Douglas (2000). Integrative Social Contracts Theory: Hype Over Hypernorms. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 26 (2):101 - 110.
Added to index2009-12-28
Total downloads22 ( #85,014 of 1,147,203 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #140,193 of 1,147,203 )
How can I increase my downloads?