Professional ethics in a virtual world: The impact of the internet on traditional notions of professionalism [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1-3):227 - 236 (2005)
Numerous articles in the popular press together with an examination of websites associated with the medical, legal, engineering, financial, and other professions leave no doubt that the role of professions has been impacted by the Internet. While offering the promise of the democratization of expertise – expertise made available to the public at convenient times and locations and at an affordable cost – the Internet is also driving a reexamination of the concept of professional identity and related claims of expertise and standards of integrity. This paper begins with a presentation of case studies illustrating the ease by which impostors infiltrate the ranks of professionals. Reports of individuals masquerading as professionals via the Internet often reveal that these imposters cause harm to the unwary victims who rely on assertions of professional expertise. Such reports motivated the authors to examine the origins and evolution of the traditional roles of professions and professionals in today’s society, as well as question how, or whether, the standards for professional practice have been adapted to the challenges posed by technology, i.e., do statements of professional ethics provide a ‘guiding light’ for practitioners and their clients in the cyber age? The authors challenge the professions to consider the notion that technology forces a confrontation between the guild-like aspects of a profession that have served, on the one hand, to protect a profession from encroachment and, on the other hand, have purportedly protected the public.
|Keywords||Democratization of information profession(s) professional ethics professional expertize professionalism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Benjamin M. Cole & Preeta M. Banerjee (2013). Morally Contentious Technology-Field Intersections: The Case of Biotechnology in the United States. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 115 (3):555-574.
Similar books and articles
Gary Varner (2008). Utilitarianism and the Evolution of Ecological Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (4):551-573.
Robert Cochran Jr (2000). Professionalism in the Postmodern Age: Its Death, Attempts at Resuscitation, and Alternate Sources of Virtue. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 14 (1):305-320.
Steven P. Nichols (1997). Professional Responsibility: The Role of the Engineer in Society. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):327-337.
Karim Jamal & Norman E. Bowie (1995). Theoretical Considerations for a Meaningful Code of Professional Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (9):703 - 714.
Sarah Banks (2004). Ethics, Accountability, and the Social Professions. Palgrave Macmillan.
Mike W. Martin (2002). Provoking Thoughts on Professionalism. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (2):279-283.
Maureen Kelley (2002). The Meanings of Professional Life: Teaching Across the Health Professions. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (4):475 – 491.
Michael Davis (2003). What Can We Learn by Looking for the First Code of Professional Ethics? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (5):433-454.
Ruth Chadwick & Alison Thompson (2000). Professional Ethics and Labor Disputes: Medicine and Nursing in the United Kingdom. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (4):483-497.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #109,984 of 1,692,897 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #193,926 of 1,692,897 )
How can I increase my downloads?