Publish or perish - self archive to flourish: The green route to open access
| Abstract | Europe is losing almost 50% of the potential return on its research investment until research funders and institutions mandate that all research findings must be made freely accessible to all would be users, webwide. It is not the number of articles published that reflects the return on Europe's research investment: A piece of research, if it is worth funding and doing at all, must not only be published, but used, applied and built upon by other researchers, worldwide. This is called 'research impact' and a measure of it is the number of times an article is cited by other articles ('citation impact'). | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Richard Wellen (2004). Taking on Commercial Scholarly Journals: Reflections on the 'Open Access' Movement. Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (1):101-118.
Stevan Harnad (2007). Ethics of Open Access to Biomedical Research: Just a Special Case of Ethics of Open Access to Research. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2 (1):31-.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-04-09Total downloads8 ( #122,951 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |

