David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1):43-58 (2010)
Until recently philosophy of religion has been almost exclusively focused upon the analysis of western religious ideas. The central concern of the discipline has been the concept God , as that concept has been understood within Judaeo-Christianity. However, this narrow remit threatens to render philosophy of religion irrelevant today. To avoid this philosophy of religion should become a genuinely multicultural discipline. But how, if at all, can philosophy of religion rise to this challenge? The paper considers fictionalism about religious discourse as a possible methodological standpoint from which to practice a tradition-neutral form of philosophy of religion. However, after examining some of the problems incurred by fictionalism, the paper concludes that fictionalism and religious diversity are uneasy bedfellows; which implies that fictionalism is unlikely to be the best theory to shape the practice of philosophy of religion in a multicultural context
|Keywords||Fictionalism Realism Comparative philosophy of religion Religious language Religious diversity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Benjamin S. Cordry (2010). A Critique of Religious Fictionalism. Religious Studies 46 (1):77-89.
Matti Eklund (2005). Fiction, Indifference, and Ontology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):557-579.
Andrew Eshleman (2010). Religious Fictionalism Defended: Reply to Cordry. Religious Studies 46 (1):91-96.
Andrew S. Eshleman (2005). Can an Atheist Believe in God? Religious Studies 41 (2):183 - 199.
Hartry Field (1980). Science Without Numbers. Princeton University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Christopher Jay (2014). The Kantian Moral Hazard Argument for Religious Fictionalism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75 (3):207-232.
Similar books and articles
Michael Scott (2010). Religious Language. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):505-515.
Amir Dastmalchian (2013). The Epistemology of Religious Diversity in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion. Philosophy Compass 8 (3):298-308.
Philip L. Quinn (2006). Essays in the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press.
Roger Pouivet (2011). Against Theological Fictionalism. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):427 - 437.
Sami Pihlström (2007). Religion and Pseudo-Religion: An Elusive Boundary. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (1):3 - 32.
Nadeem J. Z. Hussain (2004). The Return of Moral Fictionalism. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):149–188.
Dennis Potter (2013). Religious Disagreement: Internal and External. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):21-31.
Bernd Irlenborn (2010). Religious Diversity: A Philosophical Defense of Religious Inclusivism. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (2):127 - 140.
Chris John Daly (2008). Fictionalism and the Attitudes. Philosophical Studies 139 (3):423 - 440.
D. Z. Phillips (2000). Recovering Religious Concepts: Closing Epistemic Divides. St. Martin's Press.
John Hick (2007). The New Frontier of Religion and Science: Religious Experience, Neuroscience, and the Transcendent. Palgrave Macmillan.
Robert McKim (2001). Religious Ambiguity and Religious Diversity. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-11-18
Total downloads36 ( #48,042 of 1,101,623 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #17,286 of 1,101,623 )
How can I increase my downloads?