David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Research 15:79-91 (1990)
The central problem of political philosophy is how to justify coercion by government. For political theories that are based in a rational accounting of the interests of the polity, citizens must have consented at least indirectly to coercion. Such indirect consent to coercion is plausible for ordinary contexts such as, for example, submitting to legally enforceable contracts. Unfortunately, however, Hobbesian mutual advantage, contemporary contractarian, and Lockean natural rights theories, all of which ground the state in rational interests at least in large part, can justify government coercion only in principle. They cannot justify coercion by actual states. In practice, these theories are morally indeterminate
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Laura Valentini (2011). Coercion and (Global) Justice. American Political Science Review 105 (1):205-220.
Roberto Gargarella (2011). Penal Coercion in Contexts of Social Injustice. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):21-38.
Jan-Willem van der Rijt (2011). Coercive Interference and Moral Judgment. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):549-567.
Christopher W. Morris (2012). State Coercion and Force. Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):28-49.
Warren J. Samuels (1995). Society is a Process of Mutual Coercion and Governance, Selectively Perceived: Rejoinder to Higgs. Critical Review 9 (3):437-443.
Martin Gunderson (1979). Threats and Coercion. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):247 - 259.
Corey Brettschneider (2007). The Rights of the Guilty. Political Theory 35 (2):175-199.
William A. Edmundson (2012). Coercion. In Andrei Marmor (ed.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Law. Routledge.
Stephen D. Mallary, Bernard Gert & Charles M. Culver (1986). Family Coercion and Valid Consent. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (2).
Joseph Millum (2014). Consent Under Pressure: The Puzzle of Third Party Coercion. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):113-127.
Robert C. Hughes (2013). Law and Coercion. Philosophy Compass 8 (3):231-240.
Joan McGregor (1988). Bargaining Advantages and Coercion in the Market. Philosophy Research Archives 14:23-50.
Arash Abizadeh (2010). Democratic Legitimacy and State Coercion: A Reply to David Miller. Political Theory 38 (1):121-130.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads8 ( #163,493 of 1,096,600 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #258,571 of 1,096,600 )
How can I increase my downloads?