Reasonable probability of success as a moral criterion in the western just war tradition

Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):230-241 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract Finding the western just war criterion of reasonable chance of success to be a contribution to ethical decision making about armed conflict requires dealing with a number of critiques. Specifying ?probability? rather than the alternatives ?hope? or ?chance?, and raising standards of evidence involved, makes the term less vague. Expanding the concept of ?success? to include morally defensible aims that can be achieved without military victory enriches the understanding of the moral relationship between ends and means in armed conflict. Asking decision makers to accept moral responsibility for the costs of possible failure is a unique contribution to the just war criteria. The enriched concept of reasonable probability of success thus offers morally significant insights to prewar jus ad bellum decisions, and can benefit ethical decision-making about whether to continue once fighting has begun

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ethics of war.Patience Coster - 2012 - New York: Rosen Central.
The ethics of war.Anthony Joseph Coates - 1997 - New York: Distributed exclusively in the USA by St. Martin's Press.
Can There Be a Just War?Karsten J. Struhl - 2006 - Radical Philosophy Today 2006:3-25.
Ethics and US Af-Pak Policy.Eric Patterson - 2010 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):31-46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-09-25

Downloads
46 (#303,387)

6 months
6 (#201,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?