David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Philosophy and Policy 2 (02):115- (1985)
Utilitarianism and the Concept of Social Utility In this paper I propose to discuss the concepts of equality and justice from a rule utilitarian point of view, after some comments on the rule utilitarian point of view itself. Let me start with the standard definitions. Act utilitarianism is the theory that a morally right action is one that in the existing situation will produce the highest expected social utility. In contrast, rule utilitarianism is the theory that a morally right action is simply an action conforming to the correct moral rule applicable to the existing situation. The correct moral rule itself is that particular behavioral rule that would yield the highest expected social utility if it were followed by all morally motivated people in all similar situations
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A. Schäfer & R. W. Trapp (1989). Distributional Equality in Non-Classical Utilitarianism — A Proof of Lerner's Theorem for ‘Utilitarianism Incorporating Justice. Theory and Decision 26 (2):157-173.
By Michael Ridge (2006). Introducing Variable-Rate Rule-Utilitarianism. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):242–253.
Michael Ridge (2006). Introducing Variable-Rate Rule-Utilitarianism. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):242 - 253.
Peter Vallentyne (2003). Justice in General: An Introduction. In Equality and Justice: Justice in General. Routledge
Marc Fleurbaey, Maurice Salles & John A. Weymark (eds.) (2008). Justice, Political Liberalism, and Utilitarianism: Themes From Harsanyi and Rawls. Cambridge University Press.
Holly Smith (2010). Measuring the Consequences of Rules. Utilitas 22 (4):413-433.
S. Scheffler & V. Munoz-Dardé (2005). Equality and Division: Values in Principle. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 79 (79):255-284.
Madison Powers (1996). Forget About Equality. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (2):129-144.
Wendy Donner (2009). Mill. Wiley-Blackwell.
Thomas Porter (2011). Justice, Equality and Constructivism: Essays on G.A. Cohen's 'Rescuing Justice and Equality'– Brian Feltham (Ed.). [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 61 (243):434-437.
Martin W. Bunder, J. Roger Hindley & Jonathan P. Seldin (1989). On Adding (Ξ) to Weak Equality in Combinatory Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (2):590-607.
Michael J. Sandel (ed.) (2007). Justice: A Reader. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads64 ( #51,632 of 1,725,584 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #211,030 of 1,725,584 )
How can I increase my downloads?