Teaching Philosophy 30 (3):259-268 (2007)
|Abstract||For Socrates, philosophy is self-examination. If the Euthyphro is still to be philosophy in this sense, it must challenge people living now. This paper offers a reading that does this. First, a better case is made for something like the kind of expertise Euthyphro claims and for his position about piety. Second, Socrates and Euthyphro embody different views about the kind of expertise that would be relevant to discovering and engendering piety. Finally, Socrates’ unorthodox conception of piety is made explicit. With these features highlighted, the Euthyphro still possesses the power to provoke and challenge|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
William E. Mann (1998). Piety: Lending a Hand to Euthyphro. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (1):123-142.
Jason Bridges (2006). Does Informational Semantics Commit Euthyphro's Fallacy. Noûs 40 (3):522-547.
Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (1997). Socrates and the Unity of the Virtues. Journal of Ethics 1 (4):311-324.
Peter R. Costello (2005). Towards a Phenomenology of Gratitude. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:261-277.
Harry Brod (2007). Euthyphro, Foucault, and Baseball: Teaching the Euthyphro. Teaching Philosophy 30 (3):249-258.
S. Marc Cohen (1971). Socrates on the Definition of Piety. Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (1):1-13.
Gregory Vlastos (1980). The Philosophy of Socrates: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
Panos Dimas (2006). Euthyphro's Thesis Revisited. Phronesis 51 (1):1 - 28.
Gregory Vlastos (1971). The Philosophy of Socrates. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #95,504 of 722,836 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,836 )
How can I increase my downloads?