David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Thinking and Reasoning 7 (1):103 – 118 (2001)
The previous papers raise a number of issues. How should we develop task typologies both to separate judgement from related cognitive tasks and to classify tasks within the judgement domain? Are there grounds for selecting between models of judgement when empirical tests fail to do so? What techniques can be used to find out more about the cognitive processes underlying judgement behaviour? I discuss these issues and give a brief assessment of the current state of play in this rapidly changing area.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David Andrew Bell (1979). Frege's Theory of Judgement. Oxford University Press.
Sally I. Powers (1988). Moral Judgement Development Within the Family. Journal of Moral Education 17 (3):209-219.
Darcia Narvaez & Tonia Bock (2002). Moral Schemas and Tacit Judgement or How the Defining Issues Test is Supported by Cognitive Science. Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):297-314.
Rocque Reynolds (1999). Kant: The Audacity of Judgement. Res Publica 5 (1):67-82.
Nigel Harvey (2001). Studying Judgement: Models and Methods. Thinking and Reasoning 7 (1):1 – 3.
Patricia M. King & Matthew J. Mayhew (2002). Moral Judgement Development in Higher Education: Insights From the Defining Issues Test. Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):247-270.
Fiona Hughes (2006). On Aesthetic Judgement and Our Relation to Nature: Kant's Concept of Purposiveness. Inquiry 49 (6):547-572.
Stephen Neale (1998). Grain and Content. Philosophical Issues 9:353-358.
Maike Albertzart (2013). Principle-Based Moral Judgement. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):339-354.
A. John Maule (2001). Studying Judgement: Some Comments and Suggestions for Future Research. Thinking and Reasoning 7 (1):91 – 102.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #127,160 of 1,101,648 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #91,692 of 1,101,648 )
How can I increase my downloads?