The ethics of belief and two conceptions of Christian faith
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion (forthcoming)
| Abstract | This article deals with two types of Christian faith in the light of the challenges posed by the ethics of belief. It is proposed that the difficulties with Clifford’s formulation of that ethic can best be handled if the ethic is interpreted in terms of role-specific intellectual integrity. But the ethic still poses issues for the traditional interpretation of Christian faith when it is conceived as a series of discrete but related propositions, especially historical propositions. For as so conceived, the believer makes claims that fall within the province of an intellectual discipline, history, that requires evidence and rules of procedure for the adjudication of such claims. It is noteworthy how few Christian theologians and philosophers of religion deal with the issue in these terms. Alvin Plantinga is a noteworthy exception and his views are examined and criticized because, among other things, his conclusion is that any believer without having any training in biblical languages or historical studies can know that the New Testament narratives are true. The article then considers a second conception of Christian faith in which this conflict does not arise. One finds it in the works of Schleiermacher, Wittgenstein, and, surprisingly, in the conception of faith found in the early writings of Karl Barth. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAlexander Pruss (2002). Christian Faith and Belief. Faith and Philosophy 19 (3):291-303.
Robert J. Hartman (2011). Involuntary Belief and the Command to Have Faith. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):181-192.
James A. Keller (1988). Reflections on a Methodology for Christian Philosophers. Faith and Philosophy 5 (2):144-158.
Mikel Burley (2010). Is There a Tension in Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Religion? Heythrop Journal 51 (6):1000-1010.
C. Stephen Evans (1990). The Relevance of Historical Evidence for Christian Faith. Faith and Philosophy 7 (4):470-485.
Michael W. Austin (2005). Moral Difficulties in Plantinga's Model of Warranted Christian Belief. Philosophy and Theology 17 (1-2):121-132.
Michael W. Austin (2005). Moral Difficulties in Plantinga's Model of Warranted Christian Belief. Philosophy and Theology 17 (1/2):121-132.
Rik Peels (2010). The Ethics of Belief and Christian Faith as Commitment to Assumptions. Religious Studies 46 (1):97-107.
Van A. Harvey (2008). The Ethics of Belief and Two Conceptions of Christian Faith. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63 (1/3):39 - 54.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads20 ( #61,533 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,088 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
