|Abstract||A deeper understanding of the dynamics of consciousness, not only in the trivial sense of immaterial psychological relations, but as the prerequisite of the universe itself, may lead to an understanding of gravitation. The following argument acknowledges theories of higher dimensions, such as string-M-theory as important descriptive models along with the embedded theories of quantum mechanics and an expanded relativity theory. It is also presumed that the unexploited consequence of special relativity; extreme relativistic aberration , will turn out to be one of the most important keys to a better understanding of the overall unity.|
|Keywords||mind and matter consciousness relativity relativistic aberration spacetime gravitation relativity theory theory of everything memory time|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Robert E. Haraldsen, Mind, Matter and Extreme Relativistic Aberration -ERA. Mind and Matter - a Scientific Approach.
Rolf Schock (1981). The Inconsistency of the Theory of Relativity. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 12 (2):285-296.
Mario Bacelar Valente, Did the Concepts of Space and Time Change That Much with the 1905 Theory of Relativity?
John D. Norton, Einstein, NordstrÖM and the Early Demise of Scalar, Lorentz Covariant Theories of Gravitation.
Nicholas Maxwell (1988). Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Compatible? Philosophy of Science 55 (4):640-645.
D. Dieks (1988). Special Relativity and the Flow of Time. Philosophy of Science 55 (3):456-460.
Robert E. Haraldsen, The Oscillating Universe of Consciousness. Consciousness and Physichalism.
Added to index2009-07-08
Total downloads62 ( #15,512 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)30 ( #1,846 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?