Abstract

WE CAN HARDLY EXPECT the ontologist to be interested in yet another study which demands or predicts the end of ontology. By now he has become immune to condemnation by both ends of the philosophic spectrum. This is unfortunate; for his own as well as his critics' sake the ontologist should make an effort to understand what has made his enterprise seem questionable to so many, and enter into a genuine dialogue with his critics, using their attacks to give a more adequate foundation to his own convictions.