The Method Question

Hypatia 2 (3):19 - 35 (1987)
Abstract A continuing concern of many feminists and non-feminists alike has been to identify a distinctive feminist method of inquiry. This essay argues that this method question is misguided and should be abandoned. In doing so it takes up the distinctions between and relationships among methods, methodologies and epistemologies; proposes that the concern to identify sources of the power of feminist analyses motivates the method question; and suggests how to pursue this project.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified (fix it)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,653
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    George J. Agich (2001). The Question of Method in Ethics Consultation. American Journal of Bioethics 1 (4):31 – 41.
    Werner Loh (1992). Kant-Forschungen AlS Beispiel für Selbstverschuldeten Methodenmangel. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 23 (1):105 - 128.
    Johanna Oksala (2006). A Phenomenology of Gender. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3):229-244.
    Martin Calkins (2001). Casuistry and the Business Case Method. Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (2):237-259.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-05-29

    Total downloads

    5 ( #160,204 of 548,980 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,327 of 548,980 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums