Graduate studies at Western
In [Book Chapter] (1996)
|Abstract||It is hypothesized that words originated as the names of perceptual categories and that two forms of representation underlying perceptual categorization -- iconic and categorical representations -- served to ground a third, symbolic, form of representation. The third form of representation made it possible to name and describe our environment, chiefly in terms of categories, their memberships, and their invariant features. Symbolic representations can be shared because they are intertranslatable. Both categorization and translation are approximate rather than exact, but the approximation can be made as close as we wish. This is the central property of that universal mechanism for sharing descriptions that we call natural language.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dan Ryder (2009). Problems of Representation I: Nature and Role. In John Symons Paco Calvo (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Psychology. Routledge.
Stephen Grossberg (1998). Self-Organizing Features and Categories Through Attentive Resonance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):27-28.
Christopher Gauker (2011). Words and Images: An Essay on the Origin of Ideas. Oxford University Press.
Robert M. French & Elizabeth Thomas (2000). Why Localist Connectionist Models Are Inadequate for Categorization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):477-477.
Lawrence D. Roberts (2004). The Relation of Children's Early Word Acquisition to Abduction. Foundations of Science 9 (3):307-320.
Stevan Harnad, Learning Word Meaning From Dictionary Definitions: Sensorimotor Induction Precedes Verbal Instruction.
Stevan Harnad (1987). Category Induction and Representation. In [Book Chapter].
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,741 of 752,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,000 of 752,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?