Graduate studies at Western
Contemporary Aesthetics 8 (2010)
|Abstract||Some works of fiction are widely held by critics to have little value, yet these works are not only popular but also widely admired in ways that are not always appreciated. In this paper I make use of Kendall Walton’s account of fictional worlds to argue that fictional worlds can and often do have value, including aesthetic value, that is independent of the works that create them. In the process, I critique Walton’s notion of fictional worlds and offer a defense of the study and appreciation of fictional worlds, as distinguished from the works of fiction with which they are associated.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Francesco Berto (2011). Modal Meinongianism and Fiction: The Best of Three Worlds. Philosophical Studies 152 (3):313-35.
Grant Tavinor (2009). The Art of Videogames. Wiley-Blackwell.
Jeffrey Goodman (2004). A Defense of Creationism in Fiction. Grazer Philosophische Studien 67 (1):131-155.
Amie L. Thomasson (2003). Fictional Characters and Literary Practices. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2):138-157.
Kendall L. Walton (1978). How Remote Are Fictional Worlds From the Real World? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 37 (1):11-23.
Alberto Voltolini (2003). How Fictional Works Are Related to Fictional Entities. Dialectica 57 (2):225–238.
Amie L. Thomasson (2003). Speaking of Fictional Characters. Dialectica 57 (2):205–223.
Anthony Everett (2007). Pretense, Existence, and Fictional Objects. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):56–80.
Added to index2010-04-22
Total downloads53 ( #23,340 of 751,740 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,967 of 751,740 )
How can I increase my downloads?