Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||In his elegant discussion, Sripada distinguishes three possible innate bases for aspects of morality: (1) certain specific principles might be innate, (2) a less simple “principles and parameters” model might apply, and (3) innate biases might have have some influence over what morality a person acquires without determining the content of that morality.1 He argues against (1) and (2) and in favor of (3). Without disputing his case for (3) I will try to say why I think that his arguments against (1) and (2) are inconclusive and that it remains possible that all three kinds of bases have a significant impact on human morality.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Howard Adelman (1991). Morality and Ethics in Organizational Administration. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (9):665 - 678.
Michael B. Gill (2007). Moral Rationalism Vs. Moral Sentimentalism: Is Morality More Like Math or Beauty? Philosophy Compass 2 (1):16–30.
Shaun Nichols (2005). Innateness and Moral Psychology. In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York: Oxford University Press New York.
Paul Bloom (2006). The Chomsky of Morality? [REVIEW] Nature 443 (26):909-10.
Samuel Scheffler (1992). Human Morality. Oxford University Press.
Paul Russell (2008). Free Will, Art and Morality. Journal of Ethics 12 (3/4):307 - 325.
Susan Dwyer, How Not to Argue That Morality Isn't Innate: Comments on Jesse Prinz's “is Morality Innate?”.
Paul R. Lawrence (2004). The Biological Base of Morality? The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2004:59-79.
Added to index2009-06-28
Total downloads30 ( #46,469 of 739,387 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,387 )
How can I increase my downloads?