“With friends like this...”: Three flaws in Chow's defense of significance testing

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):202-203 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Chow's book should be read only by those who already have a firm enough grasp of the logic of significance testing to separate the few valid, insightful points from the many incorrect statements and misrepresentations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Significance testing – does it need this defence?Günther Palm - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):214-215.
A defense of statistical power analysis.Brian R. Lashley - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):209-210.
A plea for Popperian significance testing.Zeno G. Swijtink - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):220-221.
The critics rebutted: A pyrrhic victory.Stephan Lewandowsky & Murray Maybery - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):210-211.
Costs and benefits of statistical significance tests.Michael G. Shafto - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):218-219.
Testing significance testing: A flawed defense.John E. Hunter - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):204-204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#459,370)

6 months
9 (#250,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references