Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):45-45 (1999)
|Abstract||I examine four core aspects of WEAVER++. The necessity for lemmas is often overstated. A model can incorporate interaction between levels without feedback connections between them. There is some evidence supporting the absence of inhibition in the model. Connectionist modelling avoids the necessity of a nondecompositional semantics apparently required by the hypernym problem.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
H. E. Baber (1987). How Bad Is Rape? Hypatia 2 (2):125 - 138.
Antje S. Meyer & Willem J. M. Levelt (2000). Merging Speech Perception and Production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):339-340.
Frédéric Isel (2000). What Sort of Model Could Account for an Early Autonomy and a Late Interaction Revealed by ERPs? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):333-334.
Michael K. Tanenhaus, James S. Magnuson, Bob McMurray & Richard N. Aslin (2000). No Compelling Evidence Against Feedback in Spoken Word Recognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):348-349.
Tobey L. Doeleman, Joan A. Sereno, Allard Jongman & Sara C. Sereno (2000). Features and Feedback. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):328-329.
Padraig G. O'Seaghdha (1999). Parsimonious Feedback. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):51-52.
Johannes C. Ziegler & Guy C. Van Orden (2000). Feedback Consistency Effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):351-352.
Marie Montant (2000). Feedback: A General Mechanism in the Brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):340-341.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?