David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1):15-29 (2010)
Skeptical theism contends that, due to our cognitive limitations, we cannot expect to be able to determine whether there are reasons which justify God’s permission of apparently unjustified evils. Because this is so, the existence of these evils does not constituted evidence against God’s existence. A common criticism is that the skeptical theist is implicitly committed to other, less palatable forms of skepticism, especially moral skepticism. I examine a recent defense against this charge mounted by Michael Bergmann. I point out that the Bergmannian skeptical theist is unable to determine concerning any event or feature of the world whether that feature or event is good or evil all-things-considered. Because of this the skeptical theist must abandon any attempt to act in such a way that the world becomes better rather than worse as a result. These, I claim, are seriously skeptical conclusions, and should cause us to be skeptical about skeptical theism itself
|Keywords||Skeptical theism Evidential argument from evil Inductive skepticism Moral skepticism Unjustified evil|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Michael Bergmann (2001). Skeptical Theism and Rowe's New Evidential Argument From Evil. Noûs 35 (2):278–296.
William Rowe (1988). Evil and Theodicy. Philosophical Topics 16 (2):119-132.
William Rowe (1986). The Empirical Argument From Evil. In William Wainwright & Robert Audi (eds.), Rationality, Religious Belief, and Moral Commitment. Cornell University Press 227--247.
William L. Rowe (1991). Ruminations About Evil. Philosophical Perspectives 5:69-88.
William L. Rowe (1979). The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism. American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (4):335 - 341.
Citations of this work BETA
John Danaher (2014). Skeptical Theism and Divine Permission - A Reply to Anderson. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75 (2):101-118.
David James Anderson (2012). Skeptical Theism and Value Judgments. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 72 (1):27-39.
Paul Draper (2013). The Limitations of Pure Skeptical Theism. Res Philosophica 90 (1):97-111.
Similar books and articles
Justin P. McBrayer (2010). Skeptical Theism. Philosophy Compass 5 (7):611-623.
David Kyle Johnson (2013). A Refutation of Skeptical Theism. Sophia 52 (3):425-445.
Scott Sehon (2010). The Problem of Evil: Skeptical Theism Leads to Moral Paralysis. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (2):67 - 80.
Stephen Maitzen (2009). Skeptical Theism and Moral Obligation. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2):93 - 103.
Mark Piper (2008). Why Theists Cannot Accept Skeptical Theism. Sophia 47 (2):129-148.
Ian Wilks (2009). Skeptical Theism and Empirical Unfalsifiability. Faith and Philosophy 26 (1):64-76.
Joshua Seigal (2010). Skeptical Theism, Moral Skepticism, and Divine Deception. Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 15 (2):251-274.
Stephen Maitzen (2007). Skeptical Theism and God's Commands. Sophia 46 (3):237-243.
Jeff Snapper (2011). Paying the Cost of Skeptical Theism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (1):45-56.
Mark Piper (2007). Skeptical Theism and the Problem of Moral Aporia. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (2):65 - 79.
Nick Trakakis & Yujin Nagasawa (2004). Skeptical Theism and Moral Skepticism : A Reply to Almeida and Oppy. Ars Disputandi 4 (4):1-1.
Jeff Jordan (2006). Does Skeptical Theism Lead to Moral Skepticism? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):403 - 417.
Justin P. McBrayer (2012). Are Skeptical Theists Really Skeptics? Sometimes Yes and Sometimes No. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 72 (1):3-16.
Trent Dougherty (2008). Epistemological Considerations Concerning Skeptical Theism. Faith and Philosophy 25 (2):172-176.
Chris Tucker (forthcoming). Why Sceptical Theism Isn’T Sceptical Enough. In Trent Doughtery & Justin McBrayder (eds.), Skeptical Theism: New Essays. Oxford University Press
Added to index2010-11-18
Total downloads120 ( #15,418 of 1,707,724 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #77,173 of 1,707,724 )
How can I increase my downloads?