Graduate studies at Western
Faith and Philosophy 27 (3):321-329 (2010)
|Abstract||Jeffrey Brower and Michael Rea have proposed a model for the Trinity using a particular understanding of the relation of material constitution. I examine this model in detail and conclude that it cannot succeed. I then suggest, but do not fully develop, a model of the Trinity using an alternative notion of constitution|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
William Lane Craig (2005). Does the Problem of Material Constitution Illuminate the Doctrine of the Trinity? Faith and Philosophy 22 (1):77-86.
Jeffrey Brower (2004). Trinity. In The Cambridge Companion to Abelard. Cambridge Univ Pr.
Jeffrey E. Brower & Michael Rea (2005). Material Constitution and the Trinity. Faith and Philosophy 22 (1):57-76.
Michael Rea (2005). Material Constitution and the Trinity. Faith and Philosophy 22 (1):57-76.
Brian Leftow (2012). Time Travel and the Trinity. Faith and Philosophy 29 (3):313-324.
Daniel Howard-Snyder (2003). Trinity Monotheism. Philosophia Christi 5 (2):375 - 403.
John Zeis (1993). A Trinity on a Trinity on a Trinity. Sophia 32 (1):45 - 55.
Jeffrey E. Brower & Michael Rea (2004). Understanding the Trinity. Logos 8:145-157.
Michael C. Rea (2009). The Trinity. In Thomas P. Flint & Michael C. Rea (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press.
Dale M. Schlitt (1984). The Whole Truth. The Owl of Minerva 15 (2):169-182.
Andrew Robinson (2010). God and the World of Signs: Trinity, Evolution, and the Metaphysical Semiotics of C.S. Peirce. Brill.
Austin W. Bramwell (2004). Against Originalism: Getting Over the U. S. Constitution. Critical Review 16 (4):431-453.
Michael C. Rea (ed.) (1997). Material Constitution. Rowman & Littlefield.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads18 ( #74,535 of 722,947 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,947 )
How can I increase my downloads?