On the potential of non-classical constituency
Acta Analytica 22 (22):23-42 (1999)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Frame Psychology Science Horgan, T Tienson, J | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. Try with proxy. Try with proxy. Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJW Garson (1999). Review. Connectionism and the Philosophy of Psychology. T Horgan, J Tienson. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (2):319-323.
W. F. G. Haselager & J. F. H. Van Rappard (1998). Connectionism, Systematicity, and the Frame Problem. Minds and Machines 8 (2):161-179.
G. Marcello (2000). Horgan and Tienson on Ceteris Paribus Laws. Philosophy of Science 67 (2):301-315.
Gerard O'Brien (1989). Connectionism, Analogicity and Mental Content. Acta Analytica 22 (22):111-31.
Mary Litch (1999). Learning Connectionist Networks and the Philosophy of Psychology. Acta Analytica 22 (22):87-110.
Brian P. McLaughlin (2001). In Defense of New Wave Materialism: A Response to Horgan and Tienson. In Carl Gillett & Barry M. Loewer (eds.), Physicalism and its Discontents. Cambridge University Press.
Valerie Gray Hardcastle (1997). Distinctions Without Differences: Commentary on Horgan and Tienson's Connectionism and the Philosophy of Psychology. Philosophical Psychology 10 (3):373 – 384.
Marcello Guarini (2000). Horgan and Tienson on Ceteris Paribus Laws. Philosophy of Science 67 (2):301-315.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads14 ( #83,117 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #12,372 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
