David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 25 (3):350-356 (2008)
Providence, Evil and the Openness of God is a timely exploration of the philosophical implications of the rapidly-growing theological movement known as open theism, or the 'openness of God'. William Hasker, one of the philosophers prominently associated with this movement, presents the strengths of this position in comparison with its main competitors: Calvinism, process theism, and the theory of divine middle knowledge, or Molinism. The author develops alternative approaches to the problem of evil and to the problem of divine action in the world. In particular, he argues that believers should not maintain the view that each and every evil that occurs is permitted by God as a means to a 'greater good'. He contends that open theism makes possible an emphasis on the personalism of divine-human interaction in a way that traditional views, with their heavy emphasis on divine control, cannot easily match. The book concludes with a section of replies to critics, in which many of the objections levelled against open theism are addressed
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Justin P. McBrayer (2010). Skeptical Theism. Philosophy Compass 5 (7):611-623.
John Bishop & Ken Perszyk (2011). The Normatively Relativised Logical Argument From Evil. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (2):109-126.
Ken Perszyk (2013). Recent Work on Molinism. Philosophy Compass 8 (8):755-770.
Luke Gelinas (2009). The Problem of Natural Evil I: General Theistic Replies. Philosophy Compass 4 (3):533-559.
Justin P. McBrayer (2012). Are Skeptical Theists Really Skeptics? Sometimes Yes and Sometimes No. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 72 (1):3-16.
Similar books and articles
Brian Davies (2011). Thomas Aquinas on God and Evil. Oxford University Press.
Martin Cyril D'Arcy (1936). The Pain of This World and the Providence of God. London, New Yorklongmans, Green and Co..
Genevieve Lloyd (2008). Providence Lost. Harvard University Press.
Genevieve Lloyd (2005). Providence Lost: 'September 11' and the History of Evil. Critical Horizons 6 (1):23-43.
David O'Connor (1995). Hasker on Gratuitous Natural Evil. Faith and Philosophy 12 (3):380-392.
Norman L. Geisler (1978). The Roots of Evil. Distributed by Word Pub..
Hugh Silvester (1971). Arguing with God. Downers Grove, Ill.,Intervarsity Press.
Peter Geach (1977). Providence and Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
James R. Beebe, Logical Problem of Evil. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Mark Ian Thomas Robson (2008). Ontology and Providence in Creation: Taking Ex Nihilo Seriously. Continuum.
William Hasker (1992). Providence and Evil: Three Theories. Religious Studies 28 (1):91 - 105.
William Hasker (2007). D. Z. Phillips' Problems with Evil and with God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (3):151 - 160.
Derk Pereboom (2005). Free Will, Evil, and Divine Providence. In Andrew Dole & Andrew Chignell (eds.), God and the Ethics of Belief: New Essays in Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge University Press
Bruce Langtry (2008). God, the Best, and Evil. OUP Oxford.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads248 ( #10,335 of 1,911,418 )
Recent downloads (6 months)67 ( #7,340 of 1,911,418 )
How can I increase my downloads?