Providing or hiding information: On the evolution of amplifiers and attenuators of perceived quality differences
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Acta Biotheoretica 40 (4) (1992)
In many coevolutionary systems members of one party select members of a second party based on quality differences existing among members of the latter (e.g., predators and prey, pollinators and flowers, etc.). We examined the fate of characters that increase (amplifiers) or decrease (attenuators) the perceived amplitude of differences in the quality upon which choice of the selecting party is based. We found that the evolution of such characters depends on (i) the relationship between the cost of the character and the relative benefit it gives to the high quality individuals (if an amplifier) or low quality individuals (if an attenuator), and (ii) the frequency, among members of the selected party, of the quality sought by the selecting party.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dorota Śwituła (2006). The Concept of Quality in Clinical Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):147-156.
Mark Eli Kalderon (2007). Color Pluralism. Philosophical Review 116 (4):563-601.
Willem Bakker & Michael C. Loui (1997). Can Designing and Selling Low-Quality Products Be Ethical? Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):153-170.
Elisabetta Iossa & Bruno Jullien, The Market for Lawyers: The Value of Information on the Quality of Legal Services.
Cynthia Hughes (2010). A Preliminary Investigation Comparing Academic Locus of Control and Perceived Quality of Academic Life Across College Students with and Without Disabilities. Inquiry 25 (1):9-16.
Ray Fitzpatrick (1999). Principles and Problems in the Assessment of Quality of Life in Health Care. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (1):37-46.
Max Albert (2011). Methodology and Scientific Competition. Episteme 8 (2):165-183.
Bruce Edmonds (2011). Disaggregating Quality Judgements. Mind and Society 10 (2):169-180.
Michael Nentwich (2004). Quality Control in Academic Publishing: Challenges in the Age of Cyberscience. Poiesis and Praxis 3 (3):181-198.
P. P. M. Harteloh (2003). The Meaning of Quality in Health Care: A Conceptual Analysis. Health Care Analysis 11 (3):259-267.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?