David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
European Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):96-109 (2014)
: In The Morality of Freedom, Joseph Raz argues against a right to autonomy. This argument helps to distinguish his theory from his competitors'. For, many liberal theories ground such a right. Some even defend entirely autonomy-based accounts of rights. This paper suggests that Raz's argument against a right to autonomy raises an important dilemma for his larger theory. Unless his account of rights is limited in some way, Raz's argument applies against almost all (purported) rights, not just a right to autonomy. But, on the traditional way of limiting accounts like his, Raz's account actually supports the conclusion that people have a right to autonomy. So, unless there is another way of limiting his account that does not have this consequence, Raz's argument against a right to autonomy does not go through
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Martha Nussbaum (2001). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press.
Joseph Raz (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Oxford University Press.
John Rawls (2009/2005). A Theory of Justice. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Philosophy and Rhetoric. Oxford University Press 133-135.
Avishai Margalit & Joseph Raz (1990). National Self-Determination. Journal of Philosophy 87 (9):439-461.
Citations of this work BETA
Nicole Hassoun (2009). The Duty to Disclose (Even More) Adverse Clinical Trial Results. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):33-34.
Nicole Hassoun (2015). The Human Right to Health. Philosophy Compass 10 (4):275-283.
Similar books and articles
Loren E. Lomasky (1990). But is It Liberalism? Critical Review 4 (1-2):86-105.
Paul Wood (2000). The Promotion of Individual Autonomy in Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 22 (1):73-84.
Maria Davradou & Paul Wood (2000). The Promotion of Individual Autonomy in Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 22 (1):73-84.
Michele S. Moses (1997). Multicultural Education as Fostering Individual Autonomy. Studies in Philosophy and Education 16 (4):373-388.
Jonathan Witmer-Rich (2011). It's Good to Be Autonomous: Prospective Consent, Retrospective Consent, and the Foundation of Consent in the Criminal Law. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):377-398.
Mark Kalderon (2008). Respecting Value. European Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):341-365.
Mark Eli Kalderon (2008). Respecting Value. European Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):341-365.
Joseph Raz (1982). Liberalism, Autonomy, and the Politics of Neutral Concern. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7 (1):89-120.
Martin D. Farrell (1991). Autonomy and Paternalism: The Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Ratio Juris 4 (1):52-60.
Leonard Kahn (forthcoming). Review Essay: Legal Theory, Law, and Normativity. [REVIEW] Journal of Moral Philosophy.
Leonard Kahn (2012). Review Article: Legal Theory, Law, and Normativity. Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):115-126.
James Rocha (2011). Autonomy Within Subservient Careers. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (3):313-328.
Mark J. Bennett (2011). Hart and Raz on the Non-Instrumental Moral Value of the Rule of Law: A Reconsideration. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 30 (5):603-635.
Paula Gaido (2011). The Purpose of Legal Theory: Some Problems with Joseph Raz's View. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 30 (6):685-698.
Added to index2011-07-04
Total downloads50 ( #67,261 of 1,725,575 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,436 of 1,725,575 )
How can I increase my downloads?