The Anthropocentric Advantage

Abstract
Environmental ethicists often criticize liberalism. For, many liberals embrace anthropocentric theories on which only humans have non-instrumental value. Environmental ethicists argue that such liberals fail to account for many things that matter or provide an ethic sufficient for addressing climate change. These critics suggest that many parts of nature -- non-human individuals, other species, ecosystems and the biosphere have a kind of value beyond what they contribute to human freedom (or other things of value). This article suggests, however, that if environmental ethics are inclusive and also entail that concern for some parts of nature does not always trump concern for others, they have a different problem. For, when there are many things of value, figuring out what to do can be extremely difficult. Even though climate change is likely to cause problems for many parts of nature it will probably be good for some other parts. Inclusive environmental ethicists need a theory taking all of the things they care about into account to provide definitive reason even to address climate change. Without this theory, anthropocentric liberals might argue that we should not accept an inclusive environmental ethic. Although there may be something wrong with this line of thought, it at least raises a puzzle for those inclined to accept these ethics
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  •   Try with proxy.
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Steven Gimbel (2004). The Greening of White Pride. Philosophy and Geography 7 (1):123-140.
    Mika Hämäläinen (2012). The Concept of Advantage in Sport. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6 (3):308-322.
    Christian Diehm (2008). Staying True to Trees. Environmental Philosophy 5 (2):3-16.
    Mark Peacock (2010). Obligation and Advantage in Hobbes' Leviathan. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (3):433-458.
    Satwik Dasgupta (2011). The Anthropocentric Vision. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 6 (15):43-55.
    P. Vanderschraaf (2011). Justice as Mutual Advantage and the Vulnerable. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (2):119-147.
    James Robert Brown (1984). Realism and the Anthropocentrics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:202 - 210.
    Eugene Schlossberger (2001). Environmental Ethics. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (2):15-26.
    Ernest Partridge (1984). Nature as a Moral Resource. Environmental Ethics 6 (2):101-130.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-10-18

    Total downloads

    42 ( #33,924 of 1,089,053 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,801 of 1,089,053 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.