Theological Incompatibilism and the Necessity of the Present

Faith and Philosophy 28 (2):224-229 (2011)
Abstract Michael Rota has identified a problem in my argument for theological incompatibilism, and claims that it also undermines my argument against divinetimeless knowledge. I acknowledge the problem, but show that it is easily corrected and leaves my arguments unscathed
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,875
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Andrew M. Bailey (2012). Incompatibilism and the Past. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (2):351-376.
    Kevin Timpe (2007). Source Incompatibilism and its Alternatives. American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):284-299.
    Michael Rota (2010). A Problem for Hasker. Faith and Philosophy 27 (3):287-305.
    Eleonore Stump (2000). The Direct Argument for Incompatibilism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):459-466.
    Jason Turner (2006). Is Incompatibilism Intuitive? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):28-53.
    Susan Haack (1974). On a Theological Argument for Fatalism. Philosophical Quarterly 24 (95):156-159.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-12-02

    Total downloads

    15 ( #79,731 of 556,840 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    2 ( #39,122 of 556,840 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums