The Present Is Necessary! Rejoinder to Rota

Faith and Philosophy 29 (4):466-471 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My account of free will entails that events of the present moment are “necessary” in the same way that the past is necessary. I argue that Michael Rota’s main objection to this account is unsuccessful. I also argue that Rota’s synchronous account of contingency is inferior to the diachronic account which I favor.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Problem for Hasker.Michael Rota - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (3):287-305.
Evolution, providence, and Gouldian contingency.Michael Rota - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (4):393-412.
Causation.Michael Rota - 2011 - In Brian Davies & Eleonore Stump (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Aquinas. New York: Oxford University Press.
Substance and Artifact in Thomas Aquinas.Michael Rota - 2004 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (3):241 - 259.
Review of Daniel Schwartz, Aquinas on Friendship[REVIEW]Michael Rota - 2007 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (11).
Fundierung as a Logical Concept.Gian-Carlo Rota - 1989 - The Monist 72 (1):70-77.
The Concept of Mathematical Truth.Gian-Carlo Rota - 1991 - Review of Metaphysics 44 (3):483 - 494.
Duns Scotus on Eternity and Timelessness.Richard Cross - 1997 - Faith and Philosophy 14 (1):3-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
36 (#432,773)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Hasker
Huntington University

Citations of this work

Against Synchronic Free Will.Simon Kittle - 2022 - In Simon Kittle & Georg Gasser (eds.), The Divine Nature: Personal and A-Personal Perspectives. New York: Routledge. pp. 176-194.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Freedom and the Necessity of the Present.Michael Rota - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (4):451-465.

Add more references