Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Across the humanities and social sciences it has become commonplace for scholars to argue that categories once assumed to be “natural” are in fact “social” or, in the familiar lingo, “socially constructed”. Two common examples of such categories are race and gender, but there many others. One interpretation of this claim is that although it is typically thought that what unifies the instances of such categories is some set of natural or physical properties, instead their unity rests on social features of the items in question. Social constructionists pursuing this strategy—and it is these social constructionists I will be focusing on in this paper—aim to “debunk” the ordinary assumption that the categories are natural, by revealing the more accurate social basis of the classification.2 To avoid confusion, and to resist some of the associations with the term ‘social construction’, I will sometimes use the term ‘socially founded’ for the categories that this sort of constructionist reveals as social rather than natural.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Tim Lewens (2010). What Are 'Natural Inequalities'? Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):264-285.
Michael Root (2000). How We Divide the World. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):639.
Seumas Miller (2001). Social Action: A Teleological Account. Cambridge University Press.
Theodore Bach (2012). Gender Is a Natural Kind with a Historical Essence. Ethics 122 (2):231-272.
Ron Mallon & Daniel Kelly (2012). Making Race Out of Nothing : Psychologically Constrained Social Roles. In Harold Kincaid (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science. Oxford University Press.
Ronald R. Sundstrom (2003). Race and Place: Social Space in the Production of Human Kinds. Philosophy and Geography 6 (1):83 – 95.
Sally Anne Haslanger (2005). What Are We Talking About? The Semantics and Politics of Social Kinds. Hypatia 20 (4):10-26.
Sally Haslanger (2006). What Good Are Our Intuitions? Philosophical Analysis and Social Kinds. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 80 (1):89-118.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads44 ( #29,898 of 739,375 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,423 of 739,375 )
How can I increase my downloads?