Review essay: The importance of the history of science for philosophy in general
Synthese 106 (1):113 - 138 (1996)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesE. S. Shaffer (1976). Essay Review. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 7 (3):269-275.
Cassandra Pinnick & George Gale (2000). Philosophy of Science and History of Science: A Troubling Interaction. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31 (1):109-125.
Keith A. Nier (1986). The Importance of Historical Accuracy in Philosophy of Science: The Case of Curd's Conception of Copernican Rationality. Philosophy of Science 53 (3):372-394.
Andrew W. Lamb (2002). No Longer the Cave of History. International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (1):41-62.
S. P. Fullinwider (1993). Review of Gary Hatfield, The Natural and the Normative. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (3):485-491.
Jorge J. E. Gracia (ed.) (2011). Forging People: Race, Ethnicity, and Nationality in Hispanic American and Latino/a Thought. University of Notre Dame Press.
Richard James Blackburn (1990). The Vampire of Reason: An Essay in the Philosophy of History. Verso.
Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (1998). Essay Review. History and Philosophy of Logic 19 (4):249-266.
John Dunn (1996). The History of Political Theory and Other Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #113,980 of 549,037 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,037 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
