David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:249 - 262 (1988)
During the 1630s Descartes recognized that he could not expect all legitimate claims in natural science to meet the standard of absolute certainty. The realization resulted from a change in his physics, which itself arose not through methodological reflections, but through developments in his substantive metaphysical doctrines. Descartes discovered the metaphysical foundations of his physics in 1629-30; as a consequence, the style of explanation employed in his physical writings changed. His early methodological conceptions, as preserved in the Rules and sketched in Part Two of the Discourse, pertained primarily to his early work in optics. By the early 1630s, Descartes was concerned with new methodological problems pertaining to the postulation of micro-mechanisms. Recognition of the need to employ a method of hypothesis led him to lower the standard of certainty required of particular explanations in his mature physics.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Nima Bassiri (2012). Material Translations in the Cartesian Brain. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (1):244-255.
Gideon Manning (2012). Analogy and Falsification in Descartes' Physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (2):402-411.
Similar books and articles
Norman Malcolm (1988). Wittgenstein's Scepticism' in on Certainty. Inquiry 31 (3):277 – 293.
Ignacio L. Götz (2003). The Quest for Certainty. Journal of Philosophical Research 28:1-22.
Dale Jacquette (1996). Descartes' Lumen Naturale and the Cartesian Circle. Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):273-320.
José Luis Bermúdez (1997). Scepticism and Science in Descartes. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):743-772.
Stephen Voss (ed.) (1993). Essays on the Philosophy and Science of René Descartes. Oxford University Press.
Jeffrey McDonough (forthcoming). Descartes' Dioptrics and Descartes' Optics. In Nolan Larry (ed.), The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon. Cambridge.
A. Raftopoulos (2003). Cartesian Analysis and Synthesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):265-308.
Stephen Philip Menn (1998). Descartes and Augustine. Cambridge University Press.
Daniel Garber (2001). Descartes Embodied: Reading Cartesian Philosophy Through Cartesian Science. Cambridge University Press.
Keith G. Fennen (2012). Descartes on Indeterminate Judgment and Great Deeds. International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (1):21-39.
Tamara Albertini (2005). Crisis and Certainty of Knowledge in Al-Ghazali (1058-1111) and Descartes (1596-1650). Philosophy East and West 55 (1):1-14.
Leon Pompa (1984). The Incoherence of the Cartesian Cogito. Inquiry 27 (1-4):3 – 21.
Tom Sorell (1987). Descartes. New York ;Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads15 ( #107,531 of 1,100,778 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #289,565 of 1,100,778 )
How can I increase my downloads?