David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Perspectives on Science 8 (2):93-118 (2000)
: In this paper I address the vexed question of secondary causation in René Descartes' physics, and examine several influential interpretations, especially the one recently proposed by Dennis Des Chene. I argue that interpreters who regard Cartesian bodies as real secondary causes, on the grounds that the modes of body include real forces, contradict Descartes' account of modes. On the other hand, those who deny that Descartes affirms secondary causation, on the grounds that forces cannot be modes of extension, commit Descartes to the problematic view that the undetermined and immutable will of God is the sole cause of determinate and variable motions. Des Chene's contextualist approach to Descartes' texts leads him to an intermediate position that combines elements of both interpretations. However, in my view, Des Chene's interpretation likewise fails to resolve apparent tensions in Descartes' claims. I thus propose to separate the issue of secondary causation from what Des Chene dubs 'the problem of force'. On the basis of this approach, and a study of Jesuit commentaries familiar to Descartes, I develop a new interpretation which takes seriously Descartes' claim that the laws of nature are the secondary and particular causes of particular motions and changes in motion
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
René Descartes, Valentine Rodger Miller & Reese P. Miller (1983). Principles of Philosophy. Reidel Distributed by Kluwer Boston, C1983.
Dennis Des Chene (1996). Physiologia: Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought. Cornell University Press.
Alan Gabbey (1980). Force and Inertia in the Seventeenth Century: Descartes and Newton. In Stephen Gaukroger (ed.), Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics. Barnes & Noble Books 230--320.
Gary C. Hatfield (1979). Force (God) in Descartes' Physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 10 (2):113-140.
Nicholas Malebranche, Thomas M. Lennon & Paul J. Olscamp (1982). The Search After Truth. Philosophy of Science 49 (1):146-147.
Citations of this work BETA
Tad M. Schmaltz (2015). The Metaphysics of Rest in Descartes and Malebranche. Res Philosophica 92 (1):21-40.
Karen Detlefsen (2003). Supernaturalism, Occasionalism, and Preformation in Malebranche. Perspectives on Science 11 (4):443-483.
Similar books and articles
Edward Slowik (1999). Descartes, Spacetime, and Relational Motion. Philosophy of Science 66 (1):117-139.
Dennis Des Chene (2000). On Laws and Ends: A Response to Hattab and Menn. Perspectives on Science 8 (2):144-163.
Dennis Des Chene (2003). Life After Descartes: Régis on Generation. Perspectives on Science 11 (4):410-420.
Dennis des Chene (2005). Cogito, Ergo Sum: The Life of Rene Descartes (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (1):113-115.
Dennis des Chene (2007). Descartes Reinvented (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):498-499.
Dennis Des Chene (2003). Life After Descartes: Regis on Generation. Perspectives on Science 11 (4):410-420.
Geoffrey Gorham (2004). Cartesian Causation: Continuous, Instantaneous, Overdetermined. Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (4):389-423.
Stephen Philip Menn (2000). On Dennis Des Chene's. Perspectives on Science 8 (2).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #111,105 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #147,227 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?