David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Jamil Ragep & Sally Ragep (eds.), Tradition, Transmission, Transformation. Brill 489–525 (1996)
This chapter poses questions about the existence and character of the Scientific Revolution by deriving its initial categories of analysis and its initial understanding of the intellectual scene from the writings of the seventeenth century, and by following the evolution of these initial categories in succeeding centuries. This project fits the theme of cross cultural transmission and appropriation -- a theme of the present volume -- if one takes the notion of a culture broadly, so that, say, seventeenth and eighteenth or nineteenth century European intellectual cultures are deemed sufficiently distinct that one can speak of the "transmission" of texts and ideas from the one to the other as cross cultural. I maintain that a process of transforming and assimilating seventeenth century achievements manifests itself in two distinct cultures of interpretation, one developed by historians of philosophy, the other by scientists and historians of science. The first, following actor's categories, interprets the revolution in the seventeenth century as a philosophical displacement, partly fomented by a radical change in astronomical theory; the second, retrospectively applying the post nineteenth century sense of the term "science" to seventeenth century events, finds a "scientific" revolution, or the birth of modern science. The chapter proposes interpreting the Scientific Revolution as a revolution in natural philosophy and metaphysics
|Keywords||Scientific revolution History of science and history of philosophy New science Physics as a discipline Historiography of the Scientific Revolution History of early modern philosophy Relation of science to metaphysics Johannes Kepler Galileo Rene Descartes Johann Jakob Brucker|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Andrew Janiak (2008). Newton as Philosopher. Cambridge University Press.
Claus Zittel (2009). Theatrum Philosophicum: Descartes Und Die Rolle Ästhetischer Formen in der Wissenschaft. Akademie Verlag.
Gary Hatfield (2005). Force and Mind–Body Interaction. In Juan Jose Saldana (ed.), Science and Cultural Diversity: Proceedings of the XXIst International Congress of the History of Science. Autonomous National University of Mexico 3074-3089.
Mogens Laerke, Justin E. H. Smith & Eric Schliesser (eds.) (2013). Philosophy and Its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy. OUP USA.
Gary Hatfield (2012). Koffka, Köhler, and the “Crisis” in Psychology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (2):483-492.
Similar books and articles
David G. Rowley (1996). Bogdanov and Lenin: Epistemology and Revolution. Studies in East European Thought 48 (1):1 - 19.
Xiang Chen (1988). Reconstruction of the Optical Revolution: Lakatos Vs. Laudan. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:103 - 109.
Nicholas Maxwell (2008). Do We Need a Scientific Revolution? Journal for Biological Physics and Chemistry 8 (3):95-105.
Margaret J. Osler (ed.) (2000). Rethinking the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge University Press.
Margaret C. Jacob (1997). Scientific Culture and the Making of the Industrial West. Oxford University Press.
John Henry (2005). National Styles in Science: A Possible Factor in the Scientific Revolution? In David N. Livingstone & Charles W. J. Withers (eds.), Geography and Revolution. University of Chicago Press
William Goodwin (2007). Scientific Understanding After the Ingold Revolution in Organic Chemistry. Philosophy of Science 74 (3):386-408.
F. A. Muller (2011). Reflections on the Revolution at Stanford. Synthese 183 (1):87-114.
Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2008). Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution. Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads115 ( #34,664 of 1,911,671 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #61,248 of 1,911,671 )
How can I increase my downloads?