David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Political Theory 32 (1):34-60 (2004)
This essay interprets changes in how "the political" was employed by a group of political theorists connected to the University of California, Berkeley, from the late 1950s up to the present. Initially, the political names both what students of politics ought to study and invokes a way of studying meant to have broad appeal. In later uses, however, the political takes on an evanescent quality compared to the solid realm of generality represented in earlier work. Also, only from the 1970s on is the political explicitly identified with democracy. Finally, later uses of the political no longer invoke a mode of study with broad appeal but one that even most self-described political theorists fail to practice. Though the changes the author analyzes in how the political was conceived are specific to the work of a small group of theorists, they suggest a more general story about the late twentieth-century development of political theory in the American academy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Andrew Dobson & Robyn Eckersley (eds.) (2006). Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge. Cambridge University Press.
John Dunn (1996). The History of Political Theory and Other Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Nancy J. Hirschmann & Christine Di Stefano (eds.) (1996). Revisioning the Political: Feminist Reconstructions of Traditional Concepts in Western Political Theory. Westview Press.
Richard Tuck (1993). Philosophy and Government, 1572-1651. Cambridge University Press.
Andrés Rosler (2005). Political Authority and Obligation in Aristotle. Oxford University Press.
David Hume (1994). Political Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Ross Harrison (2003). Hobbes, Locke, and Confusion's Masterpiece: An Examination of Seventeenth-Century Political Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
D. Howard (2011). Why Study the History of Political Thought? Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (5):519-531.
Stephen K. White & J. Donald Moon (eds.) (2003). What is Political Theory? Sage Publications.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #236,751 of 1,911,757 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,986 of 1,911,757 )
How can I increase my downloads?