David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 50 (1):58-81 (1983)
This paper makes explicit and takes issue with the bizarre view, which is unfortunately prevalent among social scientists, that causal relations are features of models only. There are some good reasons to represent causal factors with independent variables. But the association between causes and independent variables is only a desideratum in model construction. It is not a criterion for judging which things are causes and which are effects
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter Spirtes (2005). Graphical Models, Causal Inference, and Econometric Models. Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (1):3-34.
Richard Scheines, On the Number of Experiments Suﬃcient and in the Worst Case Necessary to Identify All Causal Relations Among N Variables.
Peter Spirtes, Christopher Meek & Thomas Richardson, Causal Inference in the Presence of Latent Variables and Selection Bias.
Clark Glymour (2007). When is a Brain Like the Planet? Philosophy of Science 74 (3):330-347.
Clark Glymour & Richard Scheines, On the Number of Experiments Suﬃcient and in the Worst Case Necessary to Identify All Causal Relations Among N Variables.
Daniel Murray Hausman (2005). Causal Relata: Tokens, Types, or Variables? [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 63 (1):33 - 54.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #321,681 of 1,911,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #455,910 of 1,911,325 )
How can I increase my downloads?