Inquiry 47 (3):254 – 266 (2004)
|Abstract||I will focus on the topic announced in the subtitle of Professor Descombes’ profound and provocative work: The Mind’s Provisions: A Critique of Cognitivism. In the end, I will agree with practically everything in his incisive ‘critique’ except its conclusion: that cognitivism is incoherent. What he shows instead, I think, is that cognitivism, as an account of human thought and understanding, is deeply false. The difference matters because incoherence is harder to prove and, prima facie, less plausible. But, if the same argument, slightly recast, shows falsehood with even more conviction, then the essential point is saved after all. So, following a quick characterization of cognitivism, I will attempt to distill what I take to be the main grounds and themes of Descombes’ critique, explain why I don’t think they expose an incoherence, and then show how they might be recast in a way that is devastating all the same|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Vincent Descombes (1998). L'identification des Idées. Revue Philosophique De Louvain 96 (1):86-118.
Vincent Descombes (2004). Replies. Inquiry 47 (3):267 – 288.
Vincent Descombes (1986). The Socialization of Human Action. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 11 (1):131-142.
Vincent Descombes (1993). The Barometer of Modern Reason: On the Philosophies of Current Events. Oxford University Press.
Vincent Descombes (1988). A Propos of the “Critique of the Subject” and of the Critique of This Critique. Topoi 7 (2):123-131.
Charles Taylor (2004). Descombes' Critique of Cognitivism. Inquiry 47 (3):203 – 218.
Vincent Descombes (1980). Modern French Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #45,718 of 548,985 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,320 of 548,985 )
How can I increase my downloads?