Doing without mentalese
Behavior And Philosophy 23 (2):42-47 (1995)
| Abstract | Hauser defends the proposition that public languages are our languages of thought. One argument for this proposition is coincidence of productive (i.e., novel, unbounded) cognitive competence with overt possession of recursive symbol systems. Another is phenomenological experience. A third is Occam's razor and the "streetlight principle." | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,882 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJoseph Levine (1988). Demonstrating in Mentalese. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 69 (September):222-240.
Eros Corazza (2011). Unenriched Subsentential Illocutions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3):560-582.
Andrew Pessin (1995). Mentalese Syntax: Between a Rock and Two Hard Places. Philosophical Studies 78 (1):33-53.
David J. Cole (1999). I Don't Think So: Pinker on the Mentalese Monopoly. Philosophical Psychology 12 (3):283-295.
Michael Rescorla (2009). Cognitive Maps and the Language of Thought. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):377-407.
Dan I. Slobin (2002). What Language is “Mentalese”? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):700-701.
Barbara Abbott (1995). Thinking Without English. Behavior and Philosophy 23 (2):49 - 55.
Larry Hauser (1995). Natural Language and Thought: Doing Without Mentalese. Behavior and Philosophy 23 (2):41-47.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads15 ( #79,731 of 556,914 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,914 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
