David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Economics and Philosophy 31 (2):229-238 (2015)
People condemn inequalities for many reasons. For example, many who have no concern with distribution per se criticize inequalities in health care, because these inequalities lessen the benefits provided by the resources that are devoted to health care. Others who place no intrinsic value on distribution believe that a just society must show a special concern for those who are worst off. Some people, on the other hand, do place an intrinsic value on equality of distribution, regardless of its contribution to other goals. Derek Parfit and Larry Temkin call these people "egalitarians." I shall always employ quotation marks when referring to "egalitarians" in this special sense, because, as I shall argue, this terminology is misleading. One of its unhappy implications is that almost all egalitarians are not "egalitarians."
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Elizabeth S. Anderson (1999). What is the Point of Equality? Ethics 109 (2):287-337.
David Miller (1982). Arguments for Equality. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7 (1):73-83.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Harry Brighouse (2007). Equality of Opportunity and Complex Equality: The Special Place of Schooling. [REVIEW] Res Publica 13 (2):147-158.
Colin Farrelly (2004). Genes and Equality. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):587-592.
Kasper Lippert-rasmussen (2004). Are Some Inequalities More Unequal Than Others? Nature, Nurture and Equality. Utilitas 16 (2):193-219.
Christian Schemmel (2011). Why Relational Egalitarians Should Care About Distributions. Social Theory and Practice 37 (3):365-390.
Martin Peterson & Sven Ove Hansson (2005). Equality and Priority. Utilitas 17 (3):299-309.
Azam Golam (2010). Distribution of Health Care Resources in LIC: A Utilitarian Approach. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
Daniel M. Hausman, Yukiko Asada & Thomas Hedemann (2002). Health Inequalities and Why They Matter. Health Care Analysis 10 (2):177-191.
Ryan Long (2011). The Incompleteness of Luck Egalitarianism. Social Philosophy Today 27:87-96.
Carl Knight (2005). In Defence of Luck Egalitarianism. Res Publica 11 (1):1-10.
Andrew Mason (2000). XI: Equality, Personal Responsibility, and Gender Socialisation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (3):227–246.
Madison Powers (1996). Forget About Equality. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (2):129-144.
Peter Vallentyne (2002). Equality, Brute Luck, and Initial Opportunities. Ethics 112:529-557.
Larry S. Temkin (2003). Equality, Priority or What? Economics and Philosophy 19 (1):61-87.
Added to index2011-01-10
Total downloads100 ( #42,761 of 1,934,802 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #77,120 of 1,934,802 )
How can I increase my downloads?