Intelligence and the ability to take responsibility
| Abstract | In an interview with Cogito (Greece), philosopher John Haugeland proposes that the defining feature of human intelligence is responsibility. On the ethical level, this means being able to decide between what one is told to do and what one ought to do; on the cognitive level, it involves abandoning a certain theory if it fails to comply with observation | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesAdam Drozdek (1998). Human Intelligence and Turing Test. AI and Society 12 (4):315-321.
Dana K. Nelkin (2008). Responsibility and Rational Abilities: Defending an Asymmetrical View. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (4):497-515.
Kristján Kristjánsson (1999). A Prolegomena to "Emotional Intelligence". Philosophy in the Contemporary World 6 (1):49-54.
Gordana Dodig Crnkovic & Baran Çürüklü (2012). Robots: Ethical by Design. Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1):61-71.
E. Ronald & Moshe Sipper (2001). Intelligence is Not Enough: On the Socialization of Talking Machines. Minds and Machines 11 (4):567-576.
Gordon Pettit (2005). Moral Responsibility and the Ability to Do Otherwise. Journal of Philosophical Research 30:303-319.
Andrew beedle (1998). Sixteen Years of Artificial Intelligence: Mind Design and Mind Design II. Philosophical Psychology 11 (2):243 – 250.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-06-19Total downloads35 ( #34,083 of 548,983 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,320 of 548,983 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
