Ordinary devices: Reply to Bringsjord's Clarifying the Logic of Anti-Computationalism: Reply to Hauser [Book Review]
Minds and Machines 10 (1):115-117 (2000)
|Abstract||What Robots Can and Can't Be (hereinafter Robots) is, as Selmer Bringsjord says "intended to be a collection of formal-arguments-that-border-on-proofs for the proposition that in all worlds, at all times, machines can't be minds" (Bringsjord, forthcoming). In his (1994) "Précis of What Robots Can and Can't Be" Bringsjord styles certain of these arguments as proceeding "repeatedly . . . through instantiations of" the "simple schema"|
|Keywords||Computation Logic Robot Science Bringsjord, S|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Selmer Bringsjord & Alexander Bringsjord (2012). Kluge: The Haphazard Construction of the Human Mind. Philosophical Psychology 25 (2):301-305.
André Thayse (1998). Reply to Bringsjord and Ferrucci. Minds and Machines 8 (2):311-312.
Selmer Bringsjord, The Impact of Computing on Epistemology: Knowing Gödel's Mind Through Computation.
Selmer Bringsjord & David A. Ferrucci (1998). Reply to Glymour and Thayse. Minds and Machines 8 (2):313-315.
Selmer Bringsjord (2004). On Building Robot Persons: Response to Zlatev. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 14 (3):381-385.
Larry Hauser (1997). Selmer Bringsjord, What Robots Can and Can't Be, Studies in Cognitive Systems. Minds and Machines 7 (3):433-438.
Andy Clark (1988). Superman and the Duck/Rabbit: A Reply to Gordon and Bringsjord. Analysis 48 (1):54-57.
Selmer Bringsjord (2000). Clarifying the Logic of Anti-Computationalism: Reply to Hauser. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 10 (1):111-113.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #107,306 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,779 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?