David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:231 - 249 (1984)
This paper is concerned with the puzzling divorce that exists between writing on economic methodology and work by philosophers of science. After documenting the extent and nature of the separation and making some disparaging comments about the quality of much of the literature on economic methodology, this essay argues that the divorce results from the differences between the aims of philosophers of science, who are concerned to learn about knowledge acquisition in disciplines such as economics, and the more immediately practical aims of writers on economic methodology, who want to improve the practice of economics. Even with the transcendence of logical positivism or logical empiricism, this separation should persist, although communication between philosophers and eonomists should improve and collaboration increase.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Toni Vogel Carey (2012). Always or Never: Two Approaches to Ceteris Paribus. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 77 (3):317-333.
Similar books and articles
Ivan A. Boldyrev (2011). Economic Methodology: Understanding Economics as a Science. Journal of Economic Methodology 18 (4):427-432.
D. Wade Hands (2001). Economic Methodology is Dead - Long Live Economic Methodology: Thirteen Theses on the New Economic Methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (1):49-63.
Daniel M. Hausman (1992). Essays on Philosophy and Economic Methodology. Cambridge University Press.
François Claveau (2013). The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology 20 (1):81 - 86.
Edward Nik-Khah (2013). The Making of the Economy: A Phenomenology of Economic Science. Journal of Economic Methodology 20 (1):86 - 91.
Geert Reuten (1996). A Revision of the Neoclassical Economics Methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology 3 (1):39-68.
Ivan A. Boldyrev (2012). Philosophy of Science or Science and Technology Studies? Economic Methodology and Auction Theory. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (3):289-307.
Uskali Mäki (1994). Methodology Might Matter, but Weintraub's Meta-Methodology Shouldn't. Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (2):215-232.
Roger E. Backhouse (2010). Methodology in Action. Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (1):3-15.
Roger Backhouse (ed.) (1998). Explorations in Economic Methodology: From Lakatos to Empirical Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
John Hart (2009). Machlup's Misrepresentation of Hutchison's Methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3):325-340.
Uskali Mäki (ed.) (2002). Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Social Construction. Cambridge University Press.
Geert Reuten (1997). What About Falsifiability? Further Notes on Hausman's Revision of the Neoclassical Economic Methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology 4 (2):297-302.
Daniel M. Hausman (1999). 'Ultra-Deductivism', Perfect Knowledge and the Methodology of Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 6 (1):125-130.
Daniel M. Hausman (2000). Realist Philosophy and Methodology of Economics: What is It? Journal of Economic Methodology 7 (1):127-133.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads5 ( #237,418 of 1,101,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,762 of 1,101,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?